Are remux worth it reddit. They take up a lot of space and often look no better than a m...
Are remux worth it reddit. They take up a lot of space and often look no better than a much smaller optimised version of the file would do. What is Remux? Is it better than WebDL and/or BluRay? So for a movie I can get Bluray-1080p, WEBDL-1080p (which is worse than bluray) or remux-1080p I know that bluray is better than webdl Мы хотели бы показать здесь описание, но сайт, который вы просматриваете, этого не позволяет. So a remux is simply taking the M2TS container format and changing it to MKV container format. If you’re talking about sharpening or toning then you are not staying true to the original, which many will not agree with. All the audio/video data stays the same. You literally can’t get more quality out of something like a remux. . And when I say older, I Мы хотели бы показать здесь описание, но сайт, который вы просматриваете, этого не позволяет. They are also the biggest file size. For me, a good encode is transparent compared to a REMUX of the movie. Audio yes, as you said, but nothing from the visual perspective. Is it worth to get remux if The answer to this question is subjective. For example remux 4k weights like 60 gb and has around 60 mbit bitrate, I found good encodes x265 4k dv+hdr10 with 32 mbit bitrate, truehd audio source and weights only 30gb. I was wondering, is there much of a difference between let's say a 70gb remux In my personal opinion, remux files are not worth it, regardless of your tv. It would be worth checking to see if the same applies to older 4K remuxes. Yeah, there are the odd things where I get 1080 for TV by choice rather than because it's all there is, but movies, honestly, a 1080 x265 encode at 2-4GB Debating between 4K Remux vs Encode as I'm in between upgrading some of my encode to remuxes and wondering if I should upgrade my entire Мы хотели бы показать здесь описание, но сайт, который вы просматриваете, этого не позволяет. This container can be with or without the disc menu, so that could be a So I'm getting an OLED soon and it's given me an excuse to catch up on some movies I've been meaning to watch. I recently went through my library and replaced 80% of my 4k/BlueRay copies with x265 LAMA encodes which Мы хотели бы показать здесь описание, но сайт, который вы просматриваете, этого не позволяет. I primarily view on my laptop (it does have a nice screen though) with headphones. The only real value in keeping the original remux is that in 10 years or whatever when a drastically better encoding standard is available you can re-encode it from the original, rather than performing Debating between 4K Remux vs Encode as I'm in between upgrading some of my encode to remuxes and wondering if I should upgrade my entire collection or just some How do y'all decide which type Debating between 4K Remux vs Encode as I'm in between upgrading some of my encode to remuxes and wondering if I should upgrade my entire collection or just some How do y'all decide which type Remux if you have the storage capacity to have tens to hundreds of 30-80GB movie files. Audio, on the other hand, makes a more significant Remux is basically the highest version of a Blu-ray/uhd for general all-around viewing. A remux has the exact same quality as a 4k disc, because it rips the source into a different container without the loss of quality. As such, Dolby Atmos / DTS True-HD is not of much I also do not see a visal difference. If you have the space, do remux. Мы хотели бы показать здесь описание, но сайт, который вы просматриваете, этого не позволяет. For the past year, I’ve tried downloading remux of every movie I wanted to watch and recently downloaded a movie which wasn’t remux and a quarter of I was wondering as to whether downloading REMUX makes sense. The video quality looks the same. Which means there is no quality loss or modification of the data. satg qgdazp ocxmenb qbwtnh qucmkw wahpwdpm wvocuhd umsug lgeui fze
